4.7 Article

Batch dark fermentation of powdered wheat starch to hydrogen gas: Effects of the initial substrate and biomass concentrations

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 33, Issue 21, Pages 6109-6115

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.004

Keywords

Biohydrogen; Dark fermentation; Kinetics; Powdered wheat; Substrate; Biomass

Funding

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [TUB 105M296]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Powdered wheat solution was fermented batchwise for bio-hydrogen production using heat-treated anaerobic-acidogenic sludge as the inoculum at initial pH of 7.0 and temperature of 37 degrees C. In order to determine the most suitable wheat powder (WP) and cell concentrations yielding the highest hydrogen formation, initial WP concentration was varied between 5 and 30 g L-1 at a constant initial biomass concentration (2.6 g L-1). The initial biomass concentration was varied between 0.5 and 5.0 gL(-1) at constant WP concentration of 20 gL(-1) in another set of experiments. Cumulative bio-hydrogen formation, hydrogen yield and the formation rate were maximum at the WP concentration of 20 g L-1. Higher WP concentrations resulted in lower fermentation performance probably due to substrate and product (VFA) inhibition. Similarly, hydrogen formation rate and the yield were maximum with a biomass concentration of 2.5 gL(-1). Higher biomass concentrations resulted in lower hydrogen yield and formation rates due to product inhibition. The optimum initial biomass/substrate ratio maximizing the hydrogen yield and formation rate was found to be 0.125 g biomass g(-1) WP. A kinetic model was developed for bio-hydrogen formation from powdered wheat starch and the constants were determined by regression analysis. 2008 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available