4.7 Article

Conjugate natural convection in a square porous cavity filled by a nanofluid using Buongiorno's mathematical model

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 137-145

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.07.092

Keywords

Conjugate natural convection; Square porous cavity; Nanofluid; Buongiorno's model; Numerical study

Funding

  1. government task of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [13.1919.2014/K]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Steady-state natural convection heat transfer in a square porous enclosure having solid walls of finite thickness and conductivity filled by a nanofluid using the mathematical nanofluid model proposed by Buongiorno is presented. The nanofluid model takes into account the Brownian diffusion and thermophoresis effects. The study is formulated in terms of the vorticity-stream function procedure. The governing equations were solved by finite difference method and solution of algebraic equations was made on the basis of successive under relaxation method. Effort has been focused on the effects of seven types of influential factors such as the Rayleigh and Lewis numbers, the buoyancy-ratio parameter, the Brownian motion parameter, the thermophoresis parameter, the thermal conductivity ratio, and solid walls thickness on the fluid flow and heat transfer. Streamlines, isotherms, isoconcentrations, local Nusselt and Sherwood numbers are presented. It has been found that the local Nusselt number at the solid-porous interface (x = D) is an increasing function of Ra, Nr and a decreasing function of Nt, Le and D. An effect of K-r on Nu and Sh is non-monotonic. Ranges of key parameters for which.a non-homogeneous model is more appropriate for the description of the system have been determined. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available