4.7 Article

Multi-scale modelling of mass transfer limited heterogeneous reactions in open cell foams

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 75, Issue -, Pages 337-346

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.03.060

Keywords

Multi-scale modelling; Open cell foam; Pore-scale simulation; Conjugate heat transfer

Funding

  1. Kompetenzzentrum fur Energie und Mobilitat CCEM [704]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pore-scale simulations of transport phenomena in foam based catalytic converters are highly desirable due to their intrinsic accuracy in describing the involved physics. Unfortunately, such computations are prohibitively time consuming and costly. Here we combine a detailed pore-scale characterization with a volume average description of an open-cell foam based catalytic converter. The resulting volume averaged model is accurate and more than three orders of magnitude more efficient in terms of computational time, compared to direct pore scale simulations. This makes simulations of the related complex phenomena tractable, providing a highly flexible and powerful tool for parametric studies of open-cell foams. The volume-averaged model is validated with a pore-scale simulation of a full-scale catalytic converter used for automotive exhaust gas treatment. Fast chemistry is assumed and the heat released by the chemical reaction in combination with conjugate heat transfer is considered. We show that the conversion to pressure drop trade-off improves with increasing foam porosity and the heat release of the reaction significantly affects the pressure drop across the reactor. The simulations show non-uniform surface temperatures which are attributed to the non-unity Lewis number of the mass transfer limiting species. The model predictions agree well with experimental measurements of pressure drop and Sherwood number in open-cell foams. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available