4.7 Article

Flow boiling phenomena in a single annular flow regime in microchannels (I): Characterization of flow boiling heat transfer

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 703-715

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.09.058

Keywords

Enhanced flow boiling; Microchannel; Superhydrophilic silicon nanowire; Single annular flow

Funding

  1. University of South Carolina (USC)
  2. US Department of Defense, Office of Naval Research [N000140810080, N000141210724]
  3. National Science,Foundation [ECS-0335765]
  4. University of South Carolina (USC)
  5. US Department of Defense, Office of Naval Research [N000140810080, N000141210724]
  6. National Science,Foundation [ECS-0335765]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flow boiling with deionized water in silicon (Si) microchannels was drastically enhanced in a single annular flow boiling regime enabled by superhydrophilic Si nanowire inner walls. Part I of this study focuses on characterizing enhanced flow boiling heat transfer. Part II focuses on revealing mechanisms in governing pressure drop and critical heat flux (CHF). Compared to flow boiling in plain-wall microchannels without using inlet restrictors (IRs), the average heat transfer coefficient (HTC) and CHF were enhanced by up to 326% and 317% at a mass flux of 389 kg/m(2) s, respectively. Additionally, compared with flow boiling in microchannels with IRs, HTC of flow boiling in the single annular flow was enhanced by up to 248%; while CHF in the new flow boiling regime was 6.4-25.8% lower. The maximum HTC reached 125.4 kW/m(2) K at a mass flux of 404 kg/m(2) s near the exits of microchannels. The significantly promoted nucleate boiling, induced liquid film renewal, and enhanced thin-film evaporation in the self-stabilized and single flow boiling regime are the primary reasons behind the significant heat transfer enhancements during flow boiling. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available