4.7 Article

Entransy dissipation-based thermal resistance method for heat exchanger performance design and optimization

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages 156-162

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.12.062

Keywords

Heat exchanger performance; Entransy dissipation-based thermal resistance; Design method; Irreversibility

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51006060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optimal design of heat exchanger performance is of the key issue in energy conservation. Based on the entransy theory, this study deduced the formula of entransy dissipation-based thermal resistance (EDTR) for different types of heat exchangers, analyzed the factors influencing heat exchanger performance and, more importantly, developed an alternative EDTR method for the design and optimization of heat exchanger performance. The results indicate that the EDTR of parallelflow, counterflow and TEMA E-type shell-and-tube heat exchangers have a general formula, which directly connects heat exchanger performance to heat capacity rates of fluids, thermal conductance and flow arrangement of heat exchanger without introducing any phenomenological non-dimensional parameter. From this formula, it is clear that there are three factors influencing heat exchanger performance, including finite thermal conductance, different heat capacity rates of hot and cold fluids, and non-counterflow arrangement of heat exchangers. Furthermore, based on the relation among heat transfer rate, arithmetical mean temperature difference and EDTR, the total heat transfer rate in a heat exchanger can be easily calculated by the thermal conductance of heat exchanger and the heat capacity rates of fluids. Therefore, the EDTR method can analyze, compare and optimize heat exchanger performance conveniently. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available