4.7 Article

DNS and RANS modelling of a turbulent plane impinging jet

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages 789-801

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.10.031

Keywords

Impinging jet; Turbulence; DNS; RANS

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain [ENE2010-17801]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya Beatriu de Pinos [2008 BP-A 00227]
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [JCI-2009-04910]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main objective of this paper is to study in detail the fluid flow and the heat transfer in plane impinging jets. Mean and fluctuating velocities and global parameters, i.e. the local Nusselt number, are analysed. The study is focused on a Reynolds number 20,000 (based on the bulk inlet velocity and the nozzle width, B) and dimensionless jet-to-surface spacing 4. As a first step, a reliable direct numerical simulation (DNS) has been performed. Then, the DNS results have been used as reference solution to assess the performance of several Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models. Namely, explicit algebraic Reynolds stress models and both non-linear and linear eddy viscosity models in conjunction with k- epsilon and k - omega platforms. Moreover, an overview of the numerical methods and the methodology used to verify the code and the simulations is also presented. Time-averaged DNS results have revealed that the main recirculating flow cannot be captured well unless the outflow is placed at least at 4013 from the jet centreline approximately. This suggests that previous experimental data may not be adequate to study the flow configuration far from the jet. Consequently, conclusions previously published by the authors on the performance of the tested RANS models have been necessarily revised. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available