4.7 Article

Constructal conjugate cooling channels with internal heat generation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 55, Issue 15-16, Pages 4385-4396

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.04.007

Keywords

Optimisation; Laminar flow; Forced convection; Optimal geometry; Peak temperature; Constructal theory; Thermal resistance; Dynamic-Q

Funding

  1. NRF
  2. TESP
  3. University of Stellenbosch/ University of Pretoria
  4. SANERI/SANEDI
  5. CSIR
  6. EEDSM Hub
  7. NAC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a geometric optimisation of conjugate cooling channels in forced convection with internal heat generation. Two configurations were studied; circular channels and square channels. The configurations were optimised in such a way that the peak temperatures were minimised subject to the constraint of fixed total global volume. The fluid was forced through the cooling channels by the pressure difference across the channels. The structure has one degree of freedom as design variable: channel hydraulic diameter and once the optimal channel hydraulic diameter is found, optimal elemental volume and channel-to-channel spacing result. A gradient-based optimisation algorithm is applied in order to search for the best and optimal geometric configurations that improve thermal performance by minimising thermal resistance for a wide range of dimensionless pressure difference. This optimiser adequately handles the numerical objective function obtained from CFD simulations. The results obtained show the behaviour of the applied pressure difference on the optimised geometry. There are unique optimal design variables for a given pressure difference. The numerical results obtained are in agreement with the theoretical formulation using scale analysis and method of intersection of asymptotes. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available