4.7 Article

Numerical analysis of convective drying of gypsum boards

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 55, Issue 9-10, Pages 2590-2600

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.01.001

Keywords

Convective drying; Gypsum board; Heat and moisture transfer; Manufacturing; Convective transfer coefficient; Paper liner

Funding

  1. Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Convective drying of gypsum boards is investigated by numerical modelling, within the context of gypsum board manufacturing where enhancing processing efficiency, reducing energy usage and optimising product quality are essential. The aim of this parametric study is to provide a first step towards modelling of the drying process in an industrial drier by investigating the main factors impacting the drying process, such as the influence of air speed, turbulence intensity, approach flow temperature and heterogeneous drying conditions but also the influence of the paper liner on the drying process. Therefore, this study is performed for a simple configuration and at ambient air temperatures. In terms of air flow modelling. CFD simulations are performed in addition to the use of standard convective transfer coefficients. The sensitivity of the drying process to the air flow conditions is found to be limited for a gypsum board with a paper liner due to the high resistance of the paper liner to vapour transport, compared to the boundary layer resistance. Thus, guidelines for modelling drying of gypsum boards under representative manufacturing conditions conclude that detailed flow modelling is less critical to assess this specific drying problem. Instead, characterisation of the material transport properties at high temperatures is more relevant, particularly for the paper liner. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available