4.7 Article

Assessing the influence of four cutting methods on the thermal contact resistance of open-cell aluminum foam

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 55, Issue 21-22, Pages 6142-6151

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.06.033

Keywords

Open-cell aluminum foam; Cutting; Deformation; Macroscopic surface roughness; Contact surface area

Funding

  1. Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT Vlaanderen) [IWT-090273]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The application of open-cell aluminum foam often involves a cutting operation to the desired shape and dimensions. Depending on the applied cutting method, this operation can result in a significantly different contact surface area between the foam and a substrate, and a substantial plastic deformation of the struts near the cutting plane. Both are characterised for four cutting methods: circular saw, band saw, sawing wire and electron discharge machining. The first two methods result in a significant local compression. No compression is observed with the other two methods. However, the eroding nature of electron discharge machining results in blunt strut-ends which minimise the contact surface area. The highest contact surface area is obtained with a sawing wire cut. The thermal contact resistance is deduced from experimental data obtained from a press-fit bonding with 0.5 MPa pressure between foam and substrate. Data analysis is done via a conventional zeroth-order thermal resistance model. The highest thermal contact resistance is found for a sample cut with a circular saw. Cutting with band saw reduces this with 25%, electron discharge machining yields a reduction of 36% and sawing wire results in 64% reduction of the press-fit thermal contact resistance. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available