4.7 Article

3D numerical simulation on shell-and-tube heat exchangers with middle-overlapped helical baffles and continuous baffles - Part II: Simulation results of periodic model and comparison between continuous and noncontinuous helical baffles

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 52, Issue 23-24, Pages 5381-5389

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.07.007

Keywords

Heat exchangers; Helical baffles; Periodic model; Numerical simulation; Turbulence; Pressure drop; Heat transfer; Performance

Funding

  1. National Fundamental Research Program of China [2007CB206902]
  2. Key Project of Chinese Ministry of Education [306014]
  3. Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [50636050]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, based on the simplified periodic model the performance predictions for heat exchanger with middle-overlapped helical baffles are carried out by 3D simulation for three different helix angles (30 degrees, 40 degrees and 50 degrees), and the commercial codes of GAMBIT 2.3 and FLEUNT 6.3 are adopted in the simulation. It is found that the model average heat transfer coefficient per unit pressure drop of the 40 degrees angle case is the largest, which is in qualitative agreement with the existing literature. The predicted average intersection angle of this case is the smallest, being consistent with the field synergy principle. The performance of periodic model with continuous helical baffle is also compared with that of the noncontinuous middle-overlapped helical baffles. It is found that the heat transfer coefficient per unit pressure drop of the noncontinuous middle-overlapped helical baffles is appreciably larger than that of the continuous helical baffle, indicating that the heat exchanger with noncontinuous middle-overlapped helical baffles has its advantage over the one with continuous helical baffle. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available