4.5 Article

A method for characterizing cross-sections of vortices in turbulent flows

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW
Volume 37, Issue -, Pages 177-188

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.06.005

Keywords

Coherent structures; Vortices; Vortex characterization; Vortex identification

Funding

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes a new method for characterizing cross-sections of vortices in turbulent flows that is simple, robust, not selective, and above all, much less contaminated by shear than the existing methods. By relying on the approach of Kolar (Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 28, 2007) for separating swirling motions of vortices from pure shearing motions, the method computes a rigid-body-rotation vorticity that is not significantly contaminated by shear and that serves as the local measure of vortex-related vorticity. The effective radius and circulation of all detected vortices are determined by using this rigid-body-rotation vorticity in conjunction with the Gaussian vorticity distribution common to both the Oseen vortex and the Burgers vortex as a vortex template. Even if a template is necessary, no vortices are rejected because of their shape or their vorticity distribution. The errors in radius and circulation caused by the use of a vortex template in the method are analyzed with a quasi-elliptical vortex model. The advantages and limitations of this vortex characterization method are presented in detail. A wall-bounded turbulent flow is studied and it is shown that vortices are frequently in zones of strong instantaneous shear. Based on this result, we demonstrate that, contrary to rigid-body-rotation vorticity, the two commonly used measures of the local swirling rate of a vortex, vorticity and the imaginary part of the complex eigenvalues of the velocity gradient tensor lambda(ci), are strongly contaminated by shear. Hence, circulation or any vortex strength parameter directly derived from vorticity or lambda(ci) is not accurate. The main interest of the present vortex characterization method is that it overcomes this problem. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available