4.7 Article

Screening for cystic fibrosis via a magnetic and microfluidic immunoassay format with electrochemical detection using a copper nanoparticle-modified gold electrode

Journal

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 183, Issue 1, Pages 397-405

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-015-1660-z

Keywords

Immunoassay; Amperometry; Cyclic voltammetry; Horse radish peroxidase; Immunoreactive trypsin; Magnetic nanoparticles; Hydrogen peroxide; Electrodeposition

Funding

  1. Universidad Nacional de San Luis (UNSL)
  2. Instituto de Quimica de San Luis (INQUISAL)
  3. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
  4. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article describes a microfluidic electrochemical immunoassay that features two strategies, viz. (a), the incorporation of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) into the central microfluidic channel and acting as a bioaffinity support for the immobilization of the antibody against the immunoreactive trypsin (anti-IRT), and (b), the electrodeposition of copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) on a gold electrode. IRT, a marker for cystic fibrosis, is extracted from blood samples onto a disk using ultrasonication, eluted, and then injected into the detection system where it is captured by anti-IRT-loaded nanoparticles (anti-IRT-Ab-MNPs). Bound IRT is electrochemically quantified after addition of HRP-labeled anti-IRT-Ab which, in the presence of H2O2, catalyzes the oxidation of catechol to form o-benzoquinone which is detected at a working potential of -150 mV (vs. Ag/AgCl). The electrochemical response to benzoquinone is proportional to the concentration of IRT in the range from 0 to 580 nga <...mL(-1). The coefficients of variation are < 5 % for within-day assays, and < 6.4 % for between-day assays. The method was compared to a commercial ELISA for IRT where is showed a correlation coefficient of close to 1. In our perception, this approach represents an attractive alternative to existing methods for screening newborns for cystic fibrosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available