4.5 Article

Factors involved in the persistence of stress urinary incontinence from pregnancy to 2 years post partum

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
Volume 115, Issue 3, Pages 256-259

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.07.024

Keywords

Persistence; Pregnancy; Risk factors; Stress urinary incontinence; Weight

Funding

  1. Carlos III Health Institute of the Spanish Ministry of Health [PI070261]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To identify factors involved in the persistence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) from pregnancy to 2 years post partum. Method: In a longitudinal study at Donostia Hospital, San Sebastian, Spain, 458 primigravid women were recruited from April to October 2007. SUI was diagnosed via the 2002 International Continence Society definition. Severity was assessed via the Incontinence Severity Index, and impact on quality of life via the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire. Means (Student t test and analysis of variance) and percentages (chi(2) and Fisher exact tests) were compared, and multiple logistic regression analysis was performed with variables that were significant or close to significant in a univariate analysis (P<0.2). Results: Among 272 eligible women attending follow-up at 2 years post partum, 26 (9.5%) women reported persistent SUI since pregnancy. Incontinence severity was slight or moderate in most cases and the impact on quality of life was low. A higher body mass index (BMI) in pregnant women at term was the only factor found to be associated with persistent SUI (odds ratio 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.32). Conclusion: Higher BMI in pregnant women at term was an independent risk factor for the persistence of SUI from pregnancy to 2 years post partum. (C) 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available