4.5 Article

Psychosexual correlates of persistent postsurgical pain in patients with vulvodynia

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages 225-228

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.12.018

Keywords

Postoperative pain; Psychology; Treatment outcomes; Vulvodynia

Funding

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  2. National Institute of Heath [K23HD 053631, UL1RR025747]
  3. National Center for Research Resources

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine long-term reports of pain and psychologic correlates of pain in women after vestibulectomy. Methods: In a retrospective cross-sectional exploratory study, 37 women who had undergone vestibulectomy between January 1989 and January 2008 completed questionnaires assessing demographic information, self-reported levels of pain, anxiety, somatization, psychologic distress, and sexual function. Results: Eight women reported being completely pain free after surgery. The remaining 29 women reported various levels of pain during intercourse (as measured by the Gracely pain scale) and decreased sexual function (as measured by a sexual functioning questionnaire). Various measures of psychologic distress were associated with average intercourse-related pain, including brief symptom inventory (P=0.002), Pennebaker inventory of limbic languidness (P=0.002), perceived stress scale (P=0.04), and Spielberger trait-anxiety inventory (P=0.01). These same measures of psychological distress were similarly associated with general, unprovoked vaginal pain. Conclusion: The present data suggest that the pathophysiology of localized vulvodynia may be more complex in some women, leading to a suboptimal response to surgical treatment. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available