4.5 Article

Epidemiology of stillbirth and strategies for its prevention in Vietnam

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages 109-113

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.03.028

Keywords

Chorioamnionitis; Fetal death; Fetal hydrops; Low-income countries; Stillbirth; Vietnam

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To describe major epidemiologic and placental findings regarding stillbirth in Vietnam. Methods: A cross-sectional study of all stillbirths in a tertiary referral facility in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, was performed. Detailed examination of each infant, placental pathology, and semi-structured maternal interviews were conducted according to the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand Perinatal Death Classification guidelines. Maternal, fetal, and placental characteristics were examined. Results: Between December 8, 2008, and January 9, 2009, there were 4694 live births and 122 stillbirths at the facility. In total, 107 (87.7%) cases were included in the study. Low education level was associated with a lack of prenatal care; induced abortion accounted for 34.6% of fetal deaths (gender selection was not the reason); 35.5% of infants were born at 22-28 weeks of gestation; 31.8% of stillbirths were small for gestational age; histologic evidence of chorioamnionitis was present in 40.2% of cases. Calcium supplements were less likely to have been taken in cases in which death from hypertension occurred. alpha-Thalassemia was the main cause of fetal hydrops (6.2%). Conclusion: Improving access to prenatal care and prenatal calcium and iron supplementation, and screening for congenital abnormalities and alpha-thalassemia may help to reduce rates of perinatal death in Vietnam. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available