4.5 Article

Association of biochemical hyperandrogenism with type 2 diabetes and obesity in Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages 148-151

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.09.021

Keywords

Hirsutism; Hyperandrogenemia; Polycystic ovary syndrome; Obesity; Type 2 diabetes

Funding

  1. Science Technology Research Project of Guangdong Province [2008B080701026, 2007B080701014]
  2. Mega-projects of Science Research for the 11th Five-Year Plan of China [2007BA104B00]
  3. Medical Science Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [B2007053]
  4. Ministry of Education of China [20050558093]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the effect of hyperandrogenism on metabolic disorders among patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) diagnosed using the Rotterdam criteria. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the clinical records of 883 women with KOS and 717 premenopausal controls identified from the general population. Results: A total of 686 (77.7%) patients were classified with PCOS based on National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria, and 164 out of 197 (83.2%) additional patients had no hyperandrogenism. Women with normal androgen levels exhibited lower frequencies of obesity, type 2 diabetes, acanthosis nigricans, genetic history of diabetes, and elevated Matsuda index compared with hyperandrogenic patients. Hyperandrogenemia, but not hirsutism, was independently associated with the risk for type 2 diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 5.7; P=0.028) and obesity (OR 1.7; P = 0.005) among Chinese patients with PCOS. Conclusions: Hyperandrogenemia is associated with type 2 diabetes and obesity in Chinese women with PCOS and should be considered at first-line management of hyperandrogenism and infertility due to PCOS. (C) 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available