4.2 Article

Salmonella Typhimurium strain expressing OprF-OprI protects mice against fatal infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Journal

MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 9, Pages 533-544

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1348-0421.12291

Keywords

outer membrane protein; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Salmonella Typhimurium; subcutaneous vaccination

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2011AA10A210]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31502103, 31130072, 31572553]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pseudomonas aeruginosa poses a major threat to human health and to the mink industry. Thus, development of vaccines that elicit robust humoral and cellular immunity against P. aeruginosa is greatly needed. In this study, a recombinant attenuated Salmonella vaccine (RASV) that expresses the outer membrane proteins fusion OprF(190-342)-OprI(21-83) (F1I2) from P. aeruginosa was constructed and the potency of this vaccine candidate assessed by measuring F1I2-specific humoral immune responses upon vaccination through s.c. or oral routes. S.C. administration achieved higher serum IgG titers and IgA titers in the intestine and induced stronger F1I2-specific IgG and IgA titers in lung homogenate than did oral administration, which resulted in low IgG titers and no local IgA production. High titers of IFN-, IL-4, and T-lymphocyte subsets induced a mixed Th1/Th2 response in mice immunized s.c., indicating elicitation of cellular immunity. Importantly, when immunized mice were challenged with P. aeruginosa by the intranasal route 30 days after the initial immunization, s.c. vaccination achieved 77.78% protection, in contrast to 41.18% via oral administration and 66.67% via Escherichia coli-expressed F1I2 (His-F1I2) vaccination. These results indicate that s.c. vaccination provides a better protective response against P. aeruginosa infection than do oral administration and the His-F1I2 vaccine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available