4.5 Article

Prolonged Conservative Treatment of Endometrial Cancer Patients More Than 1 Pregnancy Can Be Achieved

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 72-78

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31820003de

Keywords

Endometrial carcinoma; Progestins; Conservative treatment; Fertility preservation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Preserving reproductive function in young patients with early endometrial cancer is an accepted concept today. The safety and feasibility of long-term conservative treatment, allowing more than 1 pregnancy, remain to be ascertained. Methods: This study was a retrospective chart review of a 27 women with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium, who were treated conservatively at 2 tertiary-care institutions. Treatment comprised oral high-dose progestins with or without a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. Endometrial biopsy was repeated every 2 to 3 months. Results: Over 7.8 to 412 months (median, 57.4 months), tumors regressed completely in 24 (89%) of 27 patients and partially in 2 patients, with 79% responding within 1 to 17 months. Of the complete responders, 15 (62%) of 24 had a recurrence; 4 underwent hysterectomy, and 11 underwent subsequent progestational treatment. All 11 responded, and 3 subsequently conceived. After 2 to 4 years, 5 patients again had a recurrence, of whom 3 underwent hysterectomy. Overall, 2 patients developed ovarian adenocarcinoma. All patients are currently disease-free. Conception occurred in 14 (51.8%) of 27 patients, in 5 more than once. There were 17 live births, and 2 patients are pregnant. Conclusions: According to our data, prolonged progestational therapy for early-stage endometrial adenocarcinoma, allowing women to conceive, is feasible and apparently does not alter clinical outcome. Patients should be advised of the high recurrence rate and possible concomitant ovarian malignancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available