4.6 Article

Validation of a model of gas and dense phase CO2 jet releases for carbon capture and storage application

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages 254-271

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.11.012

Keywords

CCS; Multi-phase flow; Experimental measurement; Mathematical modelling; Accidental releases; Atmospheric dispersion

Funding

  1. COOLTRANS Research Programme (Cooper)
  2. National Grid Plc
  3. National Grid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) presents a short-term option for significantly reducing the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) released into the atmosphere and mitigating the effects of climate change. To this end, National Grid initiated a programme of research known as the COOLTRANS research programme. Part of this work involves the development of a mathematical model for predicting the near-field dispersion of CO2 following the puncture or rupture of a high pressure dense phase pipeline typical of those planned for transport usage in CCS. This article describes the validation of such a model against experimental data on dense phase and gas phase releases from high pressure pipes above ground. The two-component CO2 and air model has proved capable of accurately predicting the near-field dispersing structure of such releases, including the core and radial temperatures within the sonic jets formed. This has required a three-phase accurate equation of state for pure CO2, that also accounts for the latent heat of fusion, as well as a homogeneous relaxation model to allow the modelling of non-equilibrium conditions. The work described demonstrates the capability of the model to provide accurate predictions in the shock-containing near-field region. It provides the basis for developing robust pseudo source conditions for use in CFD studies of far-field dispersion and for use with the pragmatic models used in quantified risk analysis. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available