4.6 Article

High-throughput sequencing of 16S RNA genes of soil bacterial communities from a naturally occurring CO2 gas vent

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages 176-184

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.08.014

Keywords

Chloroflexi; Capture and storage of CO2; High-throughput sequencing; Natural CO2 vent; Soil bacterial communities

Funding

  1. Fundacion Ciudad de la Energia (CIUDEN) through the PISCO2-BIO within the project PISCO2
  2. European Union, European Energy Programme for Recovery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-throughput sequencing was used to investigate the effects of CO2 emissions on the composition and structure of soil bacterial communities. Soil from an area (La Sima, Campo de Calatrava) where CO2 is released to the atmosphere from a naturally occurring gas vent venting structure. Soil samples were taken was sampled along a CO2 gradient. Bacterial community richness and diversity notably decreased with increasing CO2 flux. Bacterial community composition varied along the CO2 gradient: as CO2 flux increased, the relative abundance of Chloroflexi phylum increased, whereas the relative abundance of Acidobacteria, Verrucomicrobia and Gemmatiomonadetes phyla decreased. Within the Chloroflexi phylum, OTUs related to the genera Thermogemmatispora, Ktedonobacter and Thermomicrobium dominated bacterial communities sampled in sites with the highest CO2 flux. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) revealed that differences in bacterial communities were best explained by CO2 flux. The geological storage of CO2 has been proposed as a viable option for reducing anthropogenic CO2 contributions to atmospheric pools in order to mitigate the climatic change. These results are useful to evaluate the risk of potential CO2 leakages on ecosystems associated to geological storage of CO2. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available