4.6 Article

Techno-economic evaluation of cryogenic CO2 capture-A comparison with absorption and membrane technology

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 1559-1565

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.08.013

Keywords

Post-combustion CO2; Capture; Cryogenic; Techno-economic evaluation

Funding

  1. Shell Global Solutions International

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A techno-economic evaluation of a novel cryogenic post-combustion CO2 capture technology is presented in this work. The process concept is based on the periodic operation of cryogenically cooled packed beds. A process cycle consists of three consecutive steps: a cooling, capture and recovery step. The bed is first cooled down to temperatures below -120 degrees C during the cooling step, possibly using cold energy released during the evaporation of LNG. Flue gas is fed to the refrigerated packed bed during the capture step. The flue gas will be cooled down and components as H2O and CO2 will condense and desublimate respectively at the packing surface, while permanent gases such as N-2 will pass through the bed without undergoing any phase change. In a final recovery step the stored components will be recovered from the bed by recycling CO2 for CO2 recovery and air for H2O recovery. A basic process design focusing on the CO2/N-2 separation for a 600 MW coal fired power plant is given in this work and the CO2 avoidance costs are calculated. The influence of several process parameters is investigated, lower initial bed temperatures and higher CO2 concentrations in the feed result in more efficient use of the bed volume. The pressure drop over the system plays an important role in the process economics, due to the high flow rates required in the process. The cryogenic concept is compared to two competing technologies: amine absorption and membrane separation. The results show that the preferred technology highly depends on assumptions related to the availability of utilities. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available