4.6 Article

Investigations on CO2 storage capacity in saline aquifers-Part 2: Estimation of storage capacity coefficients

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 277-287

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.10.001

Keywords

Storage capacity; Carbon dioxide (CO2); Dimensional analysis; Numerical; Database; Forces; Capacity coefficients

Funding

  1. European Union [FP6-502599]
  2. European Commission
  3. Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology
  4. Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  5. GEOTECHNOLOGIEN [GEOTECH-328]
  6. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  7. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many studies on geological carbon dioxide (CO2) storage capacity neglect the influence of complex coupled processes which occur during and after the injection of CO2. Storage capacity is often overestimated since parts of the reservoirs cannot be reached by the CO2 plume due to gravity segregation and are thus not accessible for storage. This work investigates the effect of reservoir parameters like depth, temperature, absolute and relative permeability, and capillary pressure on the processes during CO2 injection and thus on estimates of effective storage capacity. The applied statistical characteristics of parameters are based on a large reservoir parameter database. Different measured relative permeability relations are considered. The methodology of estimating storage capacity is discussed. Using numerical 1D and 3D experiments, detailed time-dependent storage capacity estimates are derived. With respect to the concept developed in this work, it is possible to estimate effective CO2 storage capacity in saline aquifers. It is shown that effective CO2 mass stored in the reservoir varies by a factor of 20 for the reservoir setups considered. A high influence of the relative permeability relation on Storage capacity is shown. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available