4.5 Article

Conventional fluid- and nanofluid-based photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) systems: a techno-economic and environmental analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages 596-604

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15435075.2018.1525558

Keywords

Environmental analysis; mathematical model; nanofluid; PV/T system; techno-economic analysis

Funding

  1. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement [17TBIP-C124966-01]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016H1D3A1938222]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016H1D3A1938222] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the techno-economic impacts of nanofluids used as coolants to enhance the overall performance of a photovoltaic/thermal PV/T system, in comparison with conventional fluids, are discussed. A transient mathematical analysis was performed to evaluate the technical aspects and energy performance of the PV/T system. The proposed model is used to predict the annual thermal and electrical power outputs of a PV/T system based on CuO nanofluid, Al2O3 nanofluid, and conventional fluids. Economic and environmental analyses of the PV/T systems were performed by taking into account energy payback period, energy production factor, net CO2 mitigation, and net CO2 credit. Because of their greater energy unit area and levelized energy cost, nanofluid based PV/T systems have a lower payback period and better economic savings than those of conventional collectors. Using water, Al2O3 nanofluid, and CuO nanofluid, the net CO2 mitigation and net CO2 credit are 6.4tons and 156.8 USD, 6.9tons and 171.2 USD, and 7.4tons and 181.6 USD, respectively, for 30years life of the PV/T system. For typical industrial applications, PV/T systems with nanofluids should be considered as competitors to water-based PV/T collectors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available