4.5 Article

Association of grip strength with dementia in a Korean older population

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 500-505

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gps.2742

Keywords

grip strength; dementia; aged; body mass index; Korea

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [A050174]
  2. Korea Health Promotion Institute [A050174] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Several studies have found that low grip strength is associated with dementia in Western populations. However, there have been few studies in Asian populations. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine whether grip strength is independently associated with dementia after controlling for other related factors in a Korean older population. Methods: One thousand thirty-eight community-dwelling older people aged 65 or over within a defined geographic area were screened for dementia. Data on grip strength, sit-to-stand score, body mass index (BMI), socio-demographic factors (age, gender, marital status, education), and medical conditions (diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, stroke) were collected. Dementia was diagnosed with the 10/66 dementia diagnostic algorithm. Results: Eleven percent of the participants were found to have dementia. After adjustment for other factors, grip strength (per 8-kg decrease) was independently associated with dementia (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.14). Adjusted grip strength by BMI interaction terms showed marginal significance (p = 0.098); that is, older people with both reduced grip strength and low BMI were likely to be at higher risk for dementia. Conclusions: Reduced grip strength was independently associated with dementia in a Korean older population. This association was partially influenced by BMI. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available