4.5 Article

Stress affects carers before patient's first visit to a memory clinic

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 1143-1150

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gps.2238

Keywords

dementia; Cognitive Impairment No Dementia; carer; burden; Relative Stress Scale

Funding

  1. Regional Health Authority of South-Eastern Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To measure and compare the burden on spousal carers of patients with and without dementia who were consulting a memory clinic for the first time. Methods We included 413 dyads of patients and their Spousal carers consulting a memory clinic for the first time. Of them 276 had a diagnosis of Cognitive Impairment No Dementia (CIND) and 137 had a dementia diagnosis. The burden of care was measured with the Relative Stress Scale (RSS). The gender of patients and their spouses was recorded and measures of cognition, depression and functional capacity of the patients were included in the analysis. Results Of all carers, 27.6% had a score on the RSS of above 23, indicating a moderate to severe burden. The corresponding score for carers of patients with CIND was 20.3%, compared to 42.2% for those with dementia. However, in a linear regression analysis with RSS as the dependent variable, the dementia diagnosis variable was not significant. Three variables were significant (p < 0.05) and has explained 34% of the variance of the score on the RSS, impaired function in activities of daily living (ADL) was the most important variable (beta 0.56), followed by female gender of carers (beta 0.19) and the extent of the symptoms of depression observed in the patients (beta 0.10). Conclusion Carets of both CIND and dementia patients when attending a memory clinic for initial diagnostic assessment experience high levels of stress. Impaired function in ADL in patients is the strongest predictor of this stress. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available