4.6 Article

Geographical Detectors-Based Health Risk Assessment and its Application in the Neural Tube Defects Study of the Heshun Region, China

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13658810802443457

Keywords

Geographical detectors; Disease; Determinants; Spatial consistence; Birth risk

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [40471111, 70571076]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2001CB5130, 2007CB5119001, 2006AA12Z215, 2007AA12Z241, 2007DFC20180]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-YW308]
  4. California Air Resources Board, USA [55245A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physical environment, man-made pollution, nutrition and their mutual interactions can be major causes of human diseases. These disease determinants have distinct spatial distributions across geographical units, so that their adequate study involves the investigation of the associated geographical strata. We propose four geographical detectors based on spatial variation analysis of the geographical strata to assess the environmental risks of health: the risk detector indicates where the risk areas are; the factor detector identifies factors that are responsible for the risk; the ecological detector discloses relative importance between the factors; and the interaction detector reveals whether the risk factors interact or lead to disease independently. In a real-world study, the primary physical environment (watershed, lithozone and soil) was found to strongly control the neural tube defects (NTD) occurrences in the Heshun region (China). Basic nutrition (food) was found to be more important than man-made pollution (chemical fertilizer) in the control of the spatial NTD pattern. Ancient materials released from geological faults and subsequently spread along slopes dramatically increase the NTD risk. These findings constitute valuable input to disease intervention strategies in the region of interest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available