4.5 Review

Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 8, Pages 1563-1578

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03022.x

Keywords

Check-all-that-apply; consumer research; descriptive methods; flash profile; pivot profile; polarised sensory positioning; projective mapping; sensory characterisation; sensory evaluation; sorting task

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For food scientists and industrials, descriptive profiling is an essential tool that involves the evaluation of both the qualitative and quantitative sensory characteristics of a product by a panel. Recently, in response to industrial demands to develop faster and more cost-effective methods of descriptive analysis, several methods have been offered as alternatives to conventional profiling. These methods can be classified in three families: (i) verbal-based methods (flash profile and check-all-that-apply), (ii) similarity-based methods (free sorting task and projective mapping aka Napping (R)) and (iii) reference-based methods (polarised sensory positioning and pivot profile). We successively present these three classes of methods in terms of origin, principles, statistical analysis, applications to food products, variations of the methods and the Pros and Cons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available