4.7 Article

A unified framework based on the binding polynomial for characterizing biological systems by isothermal titration calorimetry

Journal

METHODS
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 99-115

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.09.010

Keywords

Isothermal titration calorimetry; Binding polynomial; Macromolecular interactions; Ligand binding; Homotropic and heterotropic chemical linkage; Allosteric and polysteric linkage

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [BFU2010-19451, PTA2009-2341-I]
  2. Miguel Servet Program from Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CP07/00289]
  3. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias [PI10/00186]
  4. Diputacion General de Aragon (Protein Targets Group B89)
  5. Diputacion General de Aragon (Digestive Pathology Group B01)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) has become the gold-standard technique for studying binding processes due to its high precision and sensitivity, as well as its capability for the simultaneous determination of the association equilibrium constant, the binding enthalpy and the binding stoichiometry. The current widespread use of ITC for biological systems has been facilitated by technical advances and the availability of commercial calorimeters. However, the complexity of data analysis for non-standard models is one of the most significant drawbacks in ITC. Many models for studying macromolecular interactions can be found in the literature, but it looks like each biological system requires specific modeling and data analysis approaches. The aim of this article is to solve this lack of unity and provide a unified methodological framework for studying binding interactions by ITC that can be applied to any experimental system. The apparent complexity of this methodology, based on the binding polynomial, is overcome by its easy generalization to complex systems. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available