4.3 Article

Comparison of Oxidative Stability among Edible Oils under Continuous Frying Conditions

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD PROPERTIES
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 1478-1490

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2014.913181

Keywords

Oxidative stability; Camellia oil; Frying; Fatty acids; Tocopherol

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31071561]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University [SKLF-ZZA-201303, SKLF-QN-201109]
  3. PhD Subject Fund from Education Department [20113601120004]
  4. Natural Science Fund from Science and Technology Department of Jiangxi Province [20114BAB214016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The stability of camellia oil (saturated fatty acid: monounsaturated fatty acid: polyunsaturated fatty acid = 1:7:1) after frying potatoes was compared with palm oil (saturated fatty acid: monounsaturated fatty acid: polyunsaturated fatty acid = 4:4:1) and peanut oil (saturated fatty acid: monounsaturated fatty acid: polyunsaturated fatty acid = 2:4:4). Oil samples were evaluated for acid value, iodine value, peroxide value, p-anisidine value, total oxidation value, tocopherols content, and fatty acids composition. There was the least change in fatty acid composition in camellia oil among the three edible oils. The alpha-tocopherol was more vulnerable to heat degradation than gamma-tocopherol and delta-tocopherol, and alpha-tocopherol was completely degraded before the whole frying process was done for palm and peanut oils. The oxidative stabilities of the three edible oils were in the order of camellia oil > palm oil > peanut oil. The oxidative stability was mainly determined by the calculated oxidizability value related to fatty acid composition, and when calculated oxidizability values were similar, the tocopherol contents of edible oils would be a key factor in affecting their oxidative stabilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available