4.7 Article

Rapid detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in raw oysters using immunomagnetic separation combined with loop-mediated isothermal amplification

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue -, Pages 123-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.01.004

Keywords

Nanoparticle; Immunomagnetic separation; Vibrio parahaemolyticus; Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP); Oyster

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to develop a method that combined nanoparticle-based immunomagnetic separation (IMS) with real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for the rapid detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Magnetic nanoparticles were functionalized with monoclonal antibodies that were produced against flagella from V. parahaemolyticus to capture and separate the target cells from raw oysters. After optimization, the immunomagnetic nanoparticles (IMNPs) presented a capture efficiency of 87.3% for 10(5) colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL of V. parahaemolyticus using 2.5 mu g of IMNPs within 30 min. Although a very low level of non-specific binding was seen among 8 non-V. parahaemolyticus Vibrio spp. and 5 non-Vibrio strains, the IMS-LAMP method identified 133 V. parahaemolyticus strains correctly without the amplification from 54 other strains. The detection limit was about 1.4 x 10(2) CFU/mL in pure culture and was unaffected by the presence of 10(8) CFU/mL of competing microflora. When applied in spiked oysters, the sensitivity was found to be 1.9 x 10(3) CFU/g without enrichment. After enrichment for 6-8 h, the limit of detectability could be improved to 1.9 to 0.19 CFU/g. Hence, the IMS-LAMP assay provided a rapid, simple, and cost-effective method for total V. parahaemolyticus detection. This method will have important implications in the rapid detection of contaminated food in the early stage before distribution. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available