Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 144, Issue 2, Pages 285-292Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.10.007
Keywords
Galactooligosaccharides; Intestinal microbiota; Bifidobacterium; Prebiotics
Categories
Funding
- United States Department of Agriculture
- GTC Nutrition
- Midwest Advanced Food Manufacturing Alliance program
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The goal of this research was to determine the effect of different doses of galactooligosaccharide (GUS) on the fecal microbiota of healthy adults, with a focus on bifidobacteria. The study was designed as a single-blinded study, with eighteen subjects consuming GOS-containing chocolate chews at four increasing dosage levels; 0, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 g. Subjects consumed each dose for 3 weeks, with a two-week baseline period preceding the study and a two-week washout period at the end. Fecal samples were collected weekly and analyzed by cultural and molecular methods. Cultural methods were used for bifidobacteria, Bacteroides, enterobacteria, enterococci, lactobacilli, and total anaerobes; culture-independent methods included denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) using Bifidobacterium-specific primers. All three methods revealed an increase in bifidobacteria populations, as the GUS dosage increased to 5 or 10 g. Enumeration of bifidobacteria by qRT-PCR showed a high inter-subject variation in bifidogenic effect and indicated a subset of 9 GOS responders among the eighteen subjects. There were no differences, however, in the initial levels of bifidobacteria between the responding individuals and the non-responding individuals. Collectively, this study showed that a high purity GOS, administered in a confection product at doses of 5 g or higher, was bifidogenic, while a dose of 2.5 g showed no significant effect. However, the results also showed that even when GUS was administered for many weeks and at high doses, there were still some individuals for which a bifidogenic response did not occur. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available