4.7 Article

Fatigue behavior of the aeronautical Al-Li (2198) aluminum alloy under constant amplitude loading

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 95-105

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.07.009

Keywords

Aluminum alloys; Constant amplitude fatigue; Tensile properties; Fracture; Specific properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tensile and fatigue mechanical behavior of wrought aluminum alloy 2198-T351 is examined and compared against 2024-T3 that is currently used in aerostructures. Experimental fatigue tests were carried out under constant amplitude stress ratio R = 0.1 and respective stress-life (S-N) diagrams were constructed for both alloys. Fatigue behavior of both alloys is described with varying parameters being the percentage of fatigue life as well as the effect of maximum applied stress as a function of ultimate tensile strength. It was found that fatigue endurance limit of AA2024-T3 is approximately 40% below its yield stress, while only 9% below for the AA2198-T351. The latter was found to be superior in the high cycle fatigue and fatigue endurance limit regimes, especially when considering specific mechanical properties. Absorbed energies per fatigue cycle as well as dynamic stiffness of the fatigue hysteresis loop were calculated and plotted against the number of fatigue cycles and with varying maximum applied stress; both parameters are continuously decreasing due to the combination of hardening effect and microcracking in AA2024-T3, while this was the case only for the high applied stresses regime in AA2198T351. Cyclic stress strain (CSS) curves were constructed and proved that work hardening exponent of AA2198-T351 is substantially decreasing with increasing fatigue life. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available