4.7 Article

High cycle fatigue behaviour of copper deformed by high pressure torsion

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 269-278

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.06.017

Keywords

Ultrafine grained copper; Severe plastic deformation; High pressure torsion; Very high cycle fatigue

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund [P17095 NO2]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P17095] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Influence of purity and process parameters on the fatigue behaviour of ultrafine grained (UFG) copper produced by high pressure torsion (HPT) was studied. A special experimental set up in combination with an ultrasonic resonance fatigue testing system was used to obtain S-N curves from miniaturized specimens in the range of 10(6)-10(9) loading cycles. Fatigue life curves were compared with conventional grain sized (CG) copper and UFG copper processed by equal channel angular pressing (ECAP). Due to the extreme fine microstructure of the HPT specimens and their enhanced tensile strength a considerable increase of fatigue life was found for all HPT specimens up to about 10(7) loading cycles. In excess of 10(7) cycles fatigue resistance of high purity HPT Cu decreased considerably whereas commercially pure HPT Cu showed excellent performance up to 10(9) cycles. Microstructural examination of the specimens confirmed that this behaviour was mainly related to the stability of the structure during the cyclic loading. The high purity HPT Cu showed a remarkable grain coarsening in the region of very high cycle fatigue leading to a strong reduction of the fatigue strength. The superior fatigue resistance of the commercial purity HPT copper was related to the higher stability of the microstructure due to the presence of impurities which prevent cyclic induced recrystallization and grain coarsening. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available