4.7 Article

A study of fatigue crack growth of 7075-T651 aluminum alloy

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 1169-1180

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.09.006

Keywords

7075-T651 aluminum alloy; fatigue crack driving force; overloading; sequence loading; stress ratio effect; underloading

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Both standard and non-standard compact specimens were employed to experimentally study the crack growth behavior of 7075-T651 aluminum alloy in ambient air. The effects of the stress ratio (R), overloading, underloading, and high-low sequence loading on fatigue crack growth rate were investigated. Significant R-ratio effect was identified. At the same R-ratio, the influence of specimen geometry on the relationship between crack growth rate and stress intensity factor range was insignificant. A single overload retarded the crack growth rate significantly. A slight acceleration of crack growth rate was identified after a single underload. The crack growth rate resumed after the crack propagated out of the influencing plastic zone created by the overload or underload. A parameter combining the stress intensity factor range and the maximum stress intensity factor can correlate the crack growth at different stress ratios well when the R-ratio ranged from -2 to 0.5. The parameter multiplied by a correction factor can be used to predict the crack growth with the influence of the R-ratio, overloading, underloading, and high-low sequence loading. Wheeler's model cannot describe the variation of fatigue crack growth with the crack length being in the overload influencing zone. A modified Wheeler's model based on the evolution of the remaining affected plastic zone was found to predict well the influence of the overload and sequence loading on the crack growth. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available