4.7 Article

A prospective study of body mass index and mortality in Bangladesh

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 1037-1045

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyp364

Keywords

Arsenic; Bangladesh; body mass index; mortality; survival analysis

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P42ES010349, R01CA102484, R01CA107431, CA014599]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m(2)) has a U- or J-shaped relationship with all-cause mortality in Western and East Asian populations. However, this relationship is not well characterized in Bangladesh, where the BMI distribution is shifted towards lower values. Methods Using data on 11 445 individuals (aged 18-75 years) participating in the Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study (HEALS) in Araihazar, Bangladesh, we prospectively examined associations of BMI (measured at baseline) with all-cause mortality during similar to 6 years of follow-up. We also examined this relationship within strata of key covariates (sex, age, smoking, education and arsenic exposure). Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for these covariates and BMI-related illnesses were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for BMI categories defined by the World Health Organization. Results Low BMI was strongly associated with increased mortality in this cohort (P-trend < 0.0001). Severe underweight (BMI < 16 kg/m(2); HR 2.06, CI 1.53-2.77) and moderate underweight (16.0-16.9 kg/m(2); HR 1.39, CI 1.01-2.90) were associated with increased all-cause mortality compared with normal BMI (18.6-22.9 kg/m(2)). The highest BMI category (>= 23.0 kg/m(2)) did not show a clear association with mortality (HR 1.10, CI 0.77-1.53). The BMI-mortality association was stronger among individuals with < 5 years of formal education (interaction P = 0.02). Conclusions Underweight (presumably due to malnutrition) is a major determinant of mortality in the rural Bangladeshi population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available