Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION
Volume 46, Issue 3-4, Pages 164-177Publisher
INDERSCIENCE ENTERPRISES LTD
DOI: 10.1504/IJEP.2011.045477
Keywords
metal pollution; threshold limits; XRF analysis; ICP-MS; legislative measures
Categories
Funding
- Geological, Seismic and Soil Survey of Regione Emilia-Romagna
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A variety of analytical techniques are commonly used to assess natural metal concentrations in soils. Although the choice of the analytical procedure may appear to be an unimportant issue, through an example from the Po Plain we document that for specific hazardous metals the arbitrary choice between separate analytical techniques may have contrasting legislative implications. Comparative analyses of 160 soil samples obtained with X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) and aqua-regia Inductive Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), respectively, reveal a systematic lower efficiency of chromium determination by ICP-MS (45-60% of XRF determinations), irrespective of the laboratory chosen. Maximum permissible concentrations of chromium for residential and recreational sites were invariably exceeded by sediments deriving from chromium-rich parent rocks after XRF analyses. In contrast, replicate determinations following aqua regia digestion were generally below the threshold values, defining the same soils as unpolluted. This study thus emphasises the need for strictly standardised procedures of metal determination.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available