4.7 Article

Effect of magnetic field on the heat and mass transfer in a vertical annulus

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages 262-278

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2010.12.002

Keywords

Magnetic field; Cylindrical annulus; Double-diffusive convection; Buoyancy ratio; Cooperating gradients; Opposing gradients

Funding

  1. UGC
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [R32-2009-000-20021-0]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [과06A1301, R32-2011-000-20021-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports the effect of axial or radial magnetic field on the double-diffusive natural convection in a vertical cylindrical annular cavity. The boundary conditions at the side walls are imposed in such a way that the thermal and solutal buoyancy effects are either cooperating or opposing, resulting in a cooperating gradients or opposing gradients flow configuration. The top and bottom walls are insulated and impermeable. The governing equations of this fluid system are solved by the Alternating Direction Implicit and the Successive Line Over Relaxation methods. Total heat and mass transfer rates across the cavity are calculated by evaluating the average Nusselt and Sherwood numbers. The main objective of the present numerical study is to understand the effect of magnetic field on the double-diffusive convection in the annular cavity. From the numerical results, it is found that the magnetic field suppresses the double-diffusive convection only for small buoyancy ratios. But, for larger buoyancy ratio, the magnetic field is effective in suppressing the thermal convective flow. Further, the magnetic field is effective when it is applied perpendicular to the main flow. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available