4.7 Article

Microbial fuel cells based on carbon veil electrodes: Stack configuration and scalability

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 32, Issue 13, Pages 1228-1240

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/er.1419

Keywords

microbial fuel cells; scalability; stack configuration; maximum power transfer; internal resistance; fluidic conductance; continuous flow; mixed culture

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, U.K.)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of three different sizes of microbial fuel cell (MFC) when operated under continuous flow conditions using acetate as the fuel substrate and show how small-scale multiple units may be best configured to optimize power output. Polarization curve experiments were carried out for individual MFCs of each size, and also for stacks of multiple small-scale MFCs, in series, parallel and series-parallel configurations. Of the three combinations, the series-parallel proved to be the more efficient one, stepping up both the voltage and current of the system, collectively. Optimum resistor loads determined for each MFC size during the polarization experiments were then used to determine the long-term mean power output. In terms of power density expressed as per unit of electrode surface area and as per unit of anode volume, the small-sized MFC was superior to both the medium- and large-scale MFCs by a factor of 1.5 and 3.5, respectively. Based on measured power output from 10 small units, a theoretical projection for 80 small units (giving the same equivalent anodic volume as one large 500mL unit) gave a projected output of 10 W m(-3), which is approximately 50 times higher than the recorded output produced by the large MFC. The results from this study suggest that MFC scale-up may be better achieved by connecting multiple small-sized units together rather than increasing the size of an individual unit. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available