4.6 Article

Mixing augmentation induced by the interaction between the oblique shock wave and a sonic hydrogen jet in supersonic flows

Journal

ACTA ASTRONAUTICA
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages 142-152

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.08.004

Keywords

Scramjet engine; Mixing enhancement; Transverse injection; Oblique shock wave; Jet-to-crossflow pressure ratio; Supersonic flow

Funding

  1. Science Foundation of National University of Defense Technology [JC14-01-01]
  2. Education Ministry of China [201460]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mixing process between the injectant and air is very important for the operation of scramjet engine, and the injectant and air should be mixed sufficiently before entering into the combustor. The three-dimensional Reynolds-average Navier-Stokes equations coupled with the SST k-omega turbulence model have been employed to investigate the interaction of the oblique shock wave and the hydrogen jet, and the influence of the wedge angle has been taken into consideration, namely the intensity of the produced oblique shock wave, as well as the jet-to-crossflow pressure ratio. In this paper, the produced oblique shock wave collides with the bottom wall upstream and downstream of the jet orifice with the variance of the wedge angle. The obtained results show that the incident shock wave makes a great difference to the mixing enhancement between the injectant and air, and there exists a critical value of the wedge angle for the scramjet engine with a certain boundary condition. This value is 20 degrees in the range considered in the current study, and the hydrogen is brought into the separation zone upstream of the jet orifice when the wedge angle is 20 degrees. At the same time, the produced oblique shock wave nearly collides with the Mach disk produced by the hydrogen jet. (C) 2015 IAA. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available