4.4 Article

Influence of Solvents and Irradiation time on Structural and Optical Properties of Cubic PbS Nanoparticles

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTROCHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages 9317-9332

Publisher

ESG
DOI: 10.20964/2018.10.37

Keywords

Lead sulfide; Solvents; Nanoparticles; Microwave Irradiation; Band gap energy

Funding

  1. Universiti Putra Malaysia under GERAN PUTRA BERIMPAK [9597200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present paper, different particle sizes of lead sulfide (PbS) nanoparticles with a cubic structure were successfully prepared using a microwave irradiation method from lead acetate [(CH3COO)(2) Pb center dot 3H(2)O] and thioacetamide (CH3CSNH2) as the starting materials. Ethylene glycol (C2H6O2 ), distilled water (H2O), ethylene alcohol (C2H5OH) and isopropanol (C3H8O) were used as solvents and a 650W oven operating at 20% of the nominal power in the period of 10 min was employed. The effect of the microwave irradiation time was investigated by varying the irradiation time from 10 to 50 minutes respectively. The resulting nanoparticles in different sizes were characterized using X-ray diffraction, Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy. The crystallite sizes were calculated from the broadening of the XRD peak using Scherrer's equation. The results showed that the increased intensity of the XRD peak and the dipole moment of the solvents being decreased corresponded with the reduction in particle sizes. The TEM results indicated that the samples consisted of separated, well-defined spherical particles and showed a small distribution size. As can be seen from the UV-vis spectrum, the band gap energy of each sample had increased and showed a characteristic blue shift due to the quantum confinement in their optical absorption. The mechanism that influenced the solvents and irradiation time for the formation of the PbS nanoparticles were discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available