4.4 Review

Paleoseismological analysis of an intraplate extensional structure: the Concud fault (Iberian Chain, eastern Spain)

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 100, Issue 7, Pages 1713-1732

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-010-0542-1

Keywords

Paleoseismology; Seismogenic fault; Trench; Iberian chain

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CGL2006-09670/BTE, CGL2009-13390]
  2. Topo-Iberia [CGL2006-041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Concud fault is a 13.5 km long, NW-SE striking normal fault at the eastern Iberian Chain. Its recent (Late Pleistocene) slip history is characterized from mapping and trench analysis and discussed in the context of the accretion/incision history of the Alfambra River. The fault has been active since Late Pliocene times, with slip rates ranging from 0.07 to 0.33 mm/year that are consistent with its present-day geomorphologic expression. The most likely empirical correlation suggests that the associated paleoseisms have potential magnitudes close to 6.8, coseismic displacements of 2.0 m, and recurrence intervals from 6.1 to 28.9 ka. At least six paleoseismic events have been identified between 113 and 32 ka. The first three events (U to W) involved displacement along the major fault plane. The last three events (X to Z) encompassed downthrow and hanging-wall synthetic bending prompting fissure opening. This change is accompanied by a decrease in slip rate (from 0.63 to 0.08-0.17 mm/year) and has been attributed to activation of a synthetic blind fault at the hanging wall. The average coseismic displacement (1.9-2.0 m) and recurrence period (6.7-7.9 ka) inferred from this paleoseismic succession are within the ranges predicted from empirical correlation. Such paleoseismic activity contrasts with the moderate present-day seismicity of the area (maximum instrumental Mb = 4.4), which can be explained by the long recurrence interval that characterizes intraplate regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available