4.4 Article

Early Cretaceous highly positive εNd felsic volcanic rocks from the Hinggan Mountains, NE China: origin and implications for Phanerozoic crustal growth

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 98, Issue 6, Pages 1395-1411

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-008-0362-8

Keywords

Crustal growth; Geochemistry; Highly positive epsilon(Nd) value; Dacite-rhyolite suite; Late Mesozoic; NE China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An early Cretaceous (135 +/- 2 Ma) felsic volcanic suite of dacite and rhyolite from Huolinhe, NE China is characterized by large ion lithophile element and light REE enrichment and high field strength element (HFSE, e. g., Nb and Ta) and Ti-P depletion, and bulk silicate earth-like Sr [Sr-87/Sr-86(i) = 0.70409-0.70481], quite radiogenic Nd [epsilon(Nd)(t) = +3.98 to +5.88], Pb [e. g., Pb-206/Pb-204(i) = 18.46-18.55] and Hf [epsilon(Hf)(t) similar to+9.2] isotope compositions. Compared with contemporaneous mafic rocks in the region, these felsic rocks have even higher Nd and Hf isotopic ratios, precluding an origin through differentiation of coeval mantle-derived magmas. Isotope calculation results suggest that these magmas were derived from a preexistent mixture composed of mainly juvenile crust (70-80%), and a subordinate recycled crustal component (20-30%) having highly radiogenic Sr and Pb and unradiogenic Nd and Hf. About 25-30% melting of such a mixed source produced the primary dacitic magma. The rhyolites, which have relatively low MgO, FeO*, Al2O3, CaO, TiO2, P2O5, Na2O, Ba, Sr, REE, HFSE and Y, were differentiates of the dacites after removal of a fractional assemblage of hornblende + plagioclase + K-feldspar + apatite + zircon. Considering the prolonged events (from 262 to 130 Ma) that produced such highly positive epsilon(Nd) felsic igneous rocks in the region, we prefer a pre-Mesozoic crustal growth model related to arc accretion associated with the Paleo-Asian Ocean subduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available