4.4 Article

Cyclostratigraphic dating in the Lower Badenian (Middle Miocene) of the Vienna Basin (Austria): the Baden-Sooss core

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages 915-930

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-007-0287-7

Keywords

Cylcostratigraphy; Middle Miocene; Badenian; Astronomical tuning

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund [P13743-BIO, P 13740-GEO, P16793-B06, P 18203-N10]
  2. Austrian Oriental Society Hammer-Purgstall
  3. OAD, Austrian Exchange Service
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P13743, P16793] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The scientific borehole Baden-Sooss penetrates a succession of Badenian (Langhian, Middle Miocene) sediments at the type locality of the Badenian, the old brickyard Baden-Sooss in the Vienna Basin. The sedimentary succession of the 102-m-cored interval consists of more than 95% bioturbated, medium-to-dark gray marly shales with carbonate contents between 11 and 25% and organic carbon contents between 0.35 and 0.65%. Biostratigraphic investigations on foraminifera (mainly lower part of Upper Lagenid Zone) and calcareous nannoplankton (standard zone NN5) indicate an early Badenian (Langhian) age. Cycles in carbonate content, organic carbon content, and magnetic susceptibility have been identified by power spectra analysis. Correlations between the three variables are extremely significant. Using cross-correlation, periods around 40 m correlate significantly with the 100 kyr(-1) eccentricity cycle, the similar to 20 m periods with the obliquity cycle, and the 15 to 11-m periods with both precession cycles. Wavelet transformation and decomposition of composite periodic functions were used to obtain the position of the cycle peaks in the profile. Cross-correlation with orbital cycles (La2004) dates the Baden-Sooss core between -14.379 +/- A 1 and -14.142 my +/- A 9 kyr.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available