4.5 Article

The successful treatment of flat warts with auricular acupuncture

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 211-215

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.05232.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Flat warts are a common presenting complaint in adolescents and adults and may be a cosmetic problem as well. Patients suffering from flat warts are often unsatisfied with conventional medical care because of adverse effects such as intolerable pain, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, or occasionally allergic contact dermatitis. To offset the possibilities of hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, and scar formation, the method of auricular acupuncture was used. Methods Single-blind method adopted, 60 subjects with flat warts were all outpatients and randomly allocated to a treatment group or a control group, with 30 patients in each group. Thirty subjects in the treatment group were treated with weekly auricular acupuncture for 10 weeks while the other subjects in the control group were treated with 0.1% of tretinoin ointment topically for 10 weeks. Results Sixteen subjects in the treatment group (53.33%) recovered fully from flat warts without recurrence during the ensuing six months' follow-up after 10 weeks' surgery compared with only one subject in the control group (3.33%). The therapeutic effect of the treatment group was statistically better than that of the control group by Mann-Whitney U-test with SPSS software (P < 0.01). During the treatment period and the ensuing six months' follow-up, no adverse effects were observed by the investigators or reported by patients. Conclusions Our findings suggest that auricular acupuncture may be a viable alternative for the treatment of flat warts. Larger randomized studies are needed to fully evaluate auricular acupuncture against more conventional treatments, and these are planned.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available