4.7 Review

Biorefineries for the production of top building block chemicals and their derivatives

Journal

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages 223-239

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2014.12.007

Keywords

Platform chemicals; Biorefinery; Commercialization; DOE report

Funding

  1. Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Changes on Systems Metabolic Engineering for Biorefineries from the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MSIP) through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea [NRF-2012-C1AAA001-2012 M1A2A2026556]
  2. NNF Center for Biosustainability [New Bioactive Compounds] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF10CC1016517] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the growing concerns on the climate change and sustainability on petrochemical resources, DOE selected and announced the bio-basecl top 12 building blocks and discussed the needs for developing biorefinery technologies to replace the current petroleum based industry in 2004. Over the last 10 years after its announcement, many studies have been performed for the development of efficient technologies for the bio-based production of these chemicals and derivatives. Now, ten chemicals among these Lop 12 chemicals, excluding the L-aspartic acid and 3-hydroxybutyrolactone, have already been commercialized or are close to commercialization. In this paper, we review the current status of biorefinery development for the production of these platform chemicals and their derivatives. In addition, current technological advances on industrial strain development for the production of platform chemicals using micro-organisms will be covered in detail with case studies on succinic acid and 3-hydroxypropionic acid as examples. (C) 2015 International Metabolic Engineering Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available