4.7 Article

Loose-limbed People: Estimating 3D Human Pose and Motion Using Non-parametric Belief Propagation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages 15-48

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-011-0493-4

Keywords

Articulated pose estimation; Articulated tracking; Human pose estimation; Human motion tracking; Non-parametric belief propagation

Funding

  1. NSF [IIS-0534858, IIS-0535075]
  2. NSF IGERT [9870676]
  3. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  4. Division Of Graduate Education [9870676] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We formulate the problem of 3D human pose estimation and tracking as one of inference in a graphical model. Unlike traditional kinematic tree representations, our model of the body is a collection of loosely-connected body-parts. In particular, we model the body using an undirected graphical model in which nodes correspond to parts and edges to kinematic, penetration, and temporal constraints imposed by the joints and the world. These constraints are encoded using pair-wise statistical distributions, that are learned from motion-capture training data. Human pose and motion estimation is formulated as inference in this graphical model and is solved using Particle Message Passing (PaMPas). PaMPas is a form of non-parametric belief propagation that uses a variation of particle filtering that can be applied over a general graphical model with loops. The loose-limbed model and decentralized graph structure allow us to incorporate information from bottom-up visual cues, such as limb and head detectors, into the inference process. These detectors enable automatic initialization and aid recovery from transient tracking failures. We illustrate the method by automatically tracking people in multi-view imagery using a set of calibrated cameras and present quantitative evaluation using the HumanEva dataset.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available