4.7 Article

Completely Convex Formulation of the Chan-Vese Image Segmentation Model

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages 103-121

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-011-0499-y

Keywords

Image segmentation; Chan-Vese model; Convex relaxation; Level set method; Vector-valued functional lifting; K-means

Funding

  1. Hong Kong RGC [GRF110311]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The active contours without edges model of Chan and Vese (IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 10(2):266-277, 2001) is a popular method for computing the segmentation of an image into two phases, based on the piecewise constant Mumford-Shah model. The minimization problem is non-convex even when the optimal region constants are known a priori. In (SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 66(5):1632-1648, 2006), Chan, Esedoalu, and Nikolova provided a method to compute global minimizers by showing that solutions could be obtained from a convex relaxation. In this paper, we propose a convex relaxation approach to solve the case in which both the segmentation and the optimal constants are unknown for two phases and multiple phases. In other words, we propose a convex relaxation of the popular K-means algorithm. Our approach is based on the vector-valued relaxation technique developed by Goldstein et al. (UCLA CAM Report 09-77, 2009) and Brown et al. (UCLA CAM Report 10-43, 2010). The idea is to consider the optimal constants as functions subject to a constraint on their gradient. Although the proposed relaxation technique is not guaranteed to find exact global minimizers of the original problem, our experiments show that our method computes tight approximations of the optimal solutions. Particularly, we provide numerical examples in which our method finds better solutions than the method proposed by Chan et al. (SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 66(5):1632-1648, 2006), whose quality of solutions depends on the choice of the initial condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available