4.7 Article

RSLAM: A System for Large-Scale Mapping in Constant-Time Using Stereo

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages 198-214

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-010-0361-7

Keywords

SLAM; Stereo; Tracking; Loop closing; SIFT

Funding

  1. Systems Engineering for Autonomous Systems (SEAS) Defence Technology Centre
  2. UK EPSRC [EP/D037077/1]
  3. EPSRC [GR/T24685/01]
  4. European Commission [FP7-231888-EUROPA]
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I005021/1, EP/D037077/1, GR/S62215/01] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/I005021/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large scale exploration of the environment requires a constant time estimation engine. Bundle adjustment or pose relaxation do not fulfil these requirements as the number of parameters to solve grows with the size of the environment. We describe a relative simultaneous localisation and mapping system (RSLAM) for the constant-time estimation of structure and motion using a binocular stereo camera system as the sole sensor. Achieving robustness in the presence of difficult and changing lighting conditions and rapid motion requires careful engineering of the visual processing, and we describe a number of innovations which we show lead to high accuracy and robustness. In order to achieve real-time performance without placing severe limits on the size of the map that can be built, we use a topo-metric representation in terms of a sequence of relative locations. When combined with fast and reliable loop-closing, we mitigate the drift to obtain highly accurate global position estimates without any global minimisation. We discuss some of the issues that arise from using a relative representation, and evaluate our system on long sequences processed at a constant 30-45 Hz, obtaining precisions down to a few meters over distances of a few kilometres.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available