4.7 Article

Robust Higher Order Potentials for Enforcing Label Consistency

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages 302-324

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-008-0202-0

Keywords

Discrete energy minimization; Markov and conditional random fields; Object recognition and segmentation

Funding

  1. EPSRC [GR/T21790/01(P)]
  2. HMGCC
  3. IST Programme of European Community, under the PASCAL Network of Excellence
  4. Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award
  5. Royal Society and Wolfson foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a novel framework for labelling problems which is able to combine multiple segmentations in a principled manner. Our method is based on higher order conditional random fields and uses potentials defined on sets of pixels (image segments) generated using unsupervised segmentation algorithms. These potentials enforce label consistency in image regions and can be seen as a generalization of the commonly used pairwise contrast sensitive smoothness potentials. The higher order potential functions used in our framework take the form of the Robust P (n) model and are more general than the P (n) Potts model recently proposed by Kohli et al. We prove that the optimal swap and expansion moves for energy functions composed of these potentials can be computed by solving a st-mincut problem. This enables the use of powerful graph cut based move making algorithms for performing inference in the framework. We test our method on the problem of multi-class object segmentation by augmenting the conventional crf used for object segmentation with higher order potentials defined on image regions. Experiments on challenging data sets show that integration of higher order potentials quantitatively and qualitatively improves results leading to much better definition of object boundaries. We believe that this method can be used to yield similar improvements for many other labelling problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available