4.2 Article

Association between tumor size and Breslow's thickness in malignant melanoma: a cross-sectional, multicenter study

Journal

MELANOMA RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 450-452

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000184

Keywords

Breslow's thickness; malignant melanoma; tumoral size

Funding

  1. Health Institute Carlos III of the Spanish Health Ministry [IP 10-1929 2010-2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to assess the potential role of tumor diameter in explaining variations in tumoral invasion and in the initial prognosis for patients with malignant melanoma (MM). This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study that recruited between 2000 and 2009 patients with primary in-situ MM (Tis) and invasive cutaneous MM. Tis and MMs with a Breslow's thickness less than 1mm (T1) were grouped (Tis-T1) and tumors with a Breslow's thickness 1mm or more were also analyzed in combination (T2-T4). The tumor size was measured after routine formalin tissue fixation. Primary outcomes were the correlation between Breslow's thickness and tumor size, and the role of tumor size in explaining variations in Breslow's thickness, as assessed by the Pearson correlation test and logistic binary regression with calculation of the odds ratios. A total of 1610 MM patients were included and analyzed. The Pearson correlation between tumor size and Breslow's thickness was 0.42, with a determination coefficient of R-2=0.18 (P>0.01). Correlations between tumor size and thickness were stronger in patients aged 30-60 years (r=0.42, R-2=0.1764, P<0.001) and in tumors arising on the upper limbs (r=0.55, R-2=0.3025). The odds ratio of identifying a T2-T4 stage MM in patients with tumors larger than 1cm in size was 2.76 (95% confidence interval 2.25-3.39, P<0.001). Even though a direct, positive, and strong association between tumoral size and Breslow's thickness might be expected in melanoma cases, the strength of this association has been moderate. Tumor size explains a low burden of the variation observed in the Breslow's thickness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available